Parents bring High Court challenge over refusal to investigate alleged pit bull attack on their boy

Stock image of a pit bull dog
The parents of a young boy allegedly attacked by a pit bull dog at a house the child was visiting have brought a High Court challenge over a refusal to investigate the incident because it was on private property.
The court heard the boy suffered severe facial injuries, requiring immediate emergency surgery, in an incident that occurred late last year.
The parents of the injured child made formal complaints to both local gardaí and the local council dog warden. The dog is still alive.
However, they were informed by those parties that the incident could not be investigated because it occurred on private property.
The family taking the action cannot be identified by order of the court.
The dog, it is claimed, was owned by an associate of the boy's father.
Read more
The alleged attack occurred when the boy and his father were visiting the dog owner's home.
The parents are unhappy with the authorities' responses and in their High Court action claim that the 1986 Control of Dogs Act is flawed, and unconstitutional.
They claim that the 1986 Act entitles persons attacked by a dog in a public place to certain legal protections and entitlements, including the issuing of fines, penalties and destruction orders by the courts in respect of dogs not kept under control.
However, they claim that the act does not afford those same protections to a person, who is lawfully present as a visitor in a dwelling house, attacked by a dangerous dog belonging to that property's owner.
They claim that from a public and common-good perspective it cannot be the case that the State is prevented from investigating a dog attack that takes place in circumstances like what they say happened to their son.
Where a complaint relates to an attack on a child, they claim that the State must act to ensure such an incident is not repeated.
The boy's parents believe that the incident should be investigated, on the grounds that criminal offences under the Control of Dogs Act and 1997 Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act have occurred.
Represented by Derek Shortall SC, instructed by solicitor Ciaran Mulholland, the judicial review proceedings are against the local council, the Garda Commissioner and the State.
They seek various orders and declarations including that sections of the Control of Dogs Act are repugnant to the Constitution, and to the European Convention on Human Rights as they fail to protect the applicants' fundamental rights to bodily integrity, fair procedures and are discriminatory.
They further seek declarations that the gardaí and the local council's refusal to investigate the matter amounts to a breach of their duty to investigate such complaints and a failure to vindicate the applicants' rights.
The matter came before Mr Justice Charles Meenan today.
The judge, on an ex-parte (one side only represented) basis, granted permission to bring the challenge.
The matter will return in October.
Today's Headlines
remanded | Man (44) covers face with hand as he is charged with ‘vicious’ murder of pensioner Thomas O’Halloran
Dancing queen | Finland's 'Party PM' Sanna Marin takes drug test as new footage with male pop star emerges
fighting words | Jake Paul calls out Conor McGregor's sparring partner Dylan Moran as he reignites feud
3-mmc | New ‘designer drug’ hits streets of Ireland
kind gesture | Sarah Jessica Parker offers to help in kitchen at short-staffed Dublin restaurant
witness appeal | Infant boy dies following tragic collision with jeep in Co Roscommon
Miami bust | Feds in Florida release images of two Irishmen arrested with gun and $32,000 in cash
toy claim | Co. Louth man claims he was not robbing filling station with a water pistol, court hears
Tragic | Family of Cork woman launch fundraiser to bring body home after death following charity hike in Scotland
famous face | Ryan Tubridy says there is no escape from fans as he is recognised all over the world