| 1°C Dublin

inconsistencies Man accused of firing shotgun into cousin's home leaving dog fatally wounded is acquitted

David Ward's defence lawyer told the jury that there was no doubt that shots were fired on the night, but that his client was not involved


David Ward

David Ward

David Ward

A man has been acquitted of recklessly firing a shotgun into his cousin's home leaving the man's dog fatally wounded.

David Ward (36) of The Beeches, Clonshaugh Woods, Clonshaugh, Coolock had pleaded not guilty of two counts, unlawful possession of a firearm and reckless discharge of a firearm, at Belcamp lane, Dublin 17, on September 17, 2016.

His trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard evidence that at around two o'clock that night, somebody fired shots into the back of the home of John Ward.

One of these shots wounded one of the complainant's three dogs and this dog later died.

Mr Ward's defence lawyer Keith Spencer BL told the jury that there was no doubt that shots were fired on the night, but that his client was not involved.

On day two of the trial on Monday afternoon, Judge Elma Sheahan discharged the jury after directing it to acquit Mr Ward of both charges.

The direction followed an application by Mr Spencer who submitted that the failure by gardaí to secure CCTV footage which could corroborate his client's alibi meant he could not get a fair trial.

Judge Sheahan noted that due to operational reasons there was a delay in garda interviewing the defendant. He was interviewed eight weeks after the shooting incident and told gardaí that he was at home all night.

Gardai had already secured CCTV footage from his apartment block for the hours around the shooting incident, but not covering the hours the defendant said he had come home and left.

When investigators went back to secure this extra footage they found the footage was overwritten automatically after 28 days.

Judge Sheahan noted that the garda evidence given in court was fair, honest and in no way misleading and said investigators had sought to preserve any relevant evidence as it became relevant.

She noted the defence submissions that the testimony of the complainant contained so many inconsistencies that it would be unfair to leave it to a jury.

Judge Sheahan said that the cumulative strength of the defence arguments, which included the fact that there was no ballistics expert for the prosecution, gave rise to the possibility of the real possibility of an unfair trial.

Sunday World Newsletter

Sign up for the latest news and updates

This field is required This field is required

Download the Sunday World app

Now download the free app for all the latest Sunday World News, Crime, Irish Showbiz and Sport. Available on Apple and Android devices

Top Videos